[Swoop] Re: swoop
Dlmcg1 at aol.com
Dlmcg1 at aol.com
Sun Oct 24 17:13:17 EDT 2004
In a message dated 10/23/2004 10:29:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
bparsia at isr.umd.edu writes:
> the one thing i tried to find but did not find was a way to see the
> ontology from just the told information (not once pellet had done its
> reasoning. i thought maybe if i chose rdfs rather than pellet that i
> would not see the result of the equivalences but this was not the
RDFS view does some "light" reasoning over the ontology. We don't have
a *pure* told view...probably the closest is rdfs without show
inherited. Or view source and the RDF/XML in all it's glory. I'm
pushing for a pure told view so we can actually handle NCI.
i would vote for a pure told view as an option. i used this a lot in
>> Ok, I think I understand the bug, though show inherited should fix it.
> maybe it does in your newer version but in mine - show inherited is
> checked and i do not see it.
Nope, it doesn't in mine.
>> If you delete the old domain and make the domain go onto
>> nga:EmergencySituation it shows up correctly (the equiv label sorts
>> alphabetically, but the domain retrieval when you have only rdfs
>> reasoning enabled doesn't look things up correctly; hmm, adding
>> pellet doesn't help! eeek)
> i tried deleting the domain of location and then adding the domain of
> emergency situation and that worked but that is not what needs to be
Yep, i wasn't proposing it as a fix, just as help for figuring out
> (yes - i know they are equivalent but this is a philosophical
> modeling question as well....)
So, as a user, would you prefer to see 3 different views depending on
which class you clicked on, with the italicized/show inherited being
different for each one? (i.e., italicized only for TerroristEvent and
if you turn off show inherited, it only shows it there?)
if i had told and derived it would be ok.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Swoop